Maximum Wage for Greedy People like Bankers? Bring it on!

22 August, 2009

Saturday, 22 August 2009 Compass High Pay Commission Campaign Compass are running a campaign for a High Pay Commission to balance the Low Pay Commission that led to the minimum wage. They have a statement that anyone in support of it can sign. This is the web address where you can read the statement and sign it in support, if you wish:

http://www.compassonline.org.uk/…ign.asp?n=5246

The greed of the bankers has shown a maximum wage is needed. Let us support it. It’s fair.

Tags: | | | | | | | |


Charlotte Higgins on America’s New Cicero

1 December, 2008

Barack Obama’s speeches are much admired and endlessly analysed. The sheer numbers of people who have heard him speak live set him apart from his rivals, recalling the politics of ancient Athens, where the public speech given to ordinary voters was the motor of politics, and where the art of rhetoric matured alongside democracy.

But, says Charlotte Higgins—author of a Short Book on how Ancient Greece has shaped our world—in an article in The Guardian, 26 November, 2008, one of their most interesting aspects is the enormous debt they owe to the oratory of the Romans, and, through sermons, the church, which taught the rhetorical tradition of the ancients as practically useful to its aims, while destroying most of the rest of classical tradition. To understand the next four years of American politics, we will need to understand something of the politics of ancient Greece and Rome. The Greeks and Romans discovered all there was to know about rhetoric, and they put a name to most of the devices it used.

Unlike most politicians who make a point of dumbing down the content of their addresses, Obama’s speeches respect the intelligence of their audience. The adjective used to describe Obama’s oratorical skill is “Ciceronian”. Cicero, the outstanding Roman politician of the late republic, was the greatest orator of his time, and one of the greatest in history, though, more immediately, Obama looks to Lincoln, Roosevelt and King.

Winston Churchill recommends it!

Winston Churchill recommends it!

Like Cicero, Obama is a lawyer. Like Cicero, Obama entered politics without family backing or a military record, in contrast to his rivals McCain and the Clintons who had one or the other. Like Cicero, Obama is a writer of enormous accomplishment—Dreams From My Father, Obama’s first book, will surely enter the American literary canon, Higgins says. In the intricacies of speechifying, Obama recalls Cicero—Obama knows and uses them, too. Like Cicero, Obama likes “tricola”, the linking of three words or phrases, as in Caesar’s veni, vidi, vinci. In his 4 November speech, Obama said, “Our campaign… began in the backyards of Des Moines and the living rooms of Concord and the front porches of Charleston”, which is a tricolon. In the 2004 Democratic convention speech, Obama used the technique of “praeteritio”—drawing attention to a subject by not discussing it. Higgins notes that Obama excels in the projection of ethos. In his book On The Orator, a book which aspiring politicians must read now, surely, he argues that real eloquence can be acquired only if the speaker has attained the highest state of knowledge—“otherwise what he says is just an empty and ridiculous swirl of verbiage”.

The true orator is one whose practice of citizenship embodies a civic ideal—whose rhetoric is not empty, as McCain tried to imply, but is the deliberate, rational, careful organiser of ideas and argument that propels the state forward safely and wisely. Higgins asks finally, “Can Obama’s words translate into deeds?”.


Americans reject GOP religiosity as well as politics

14 November, 2008

For a generation in the United States, conservative Christians politicized themselves, and so the GOP adopted their religious politics, opposing stem cell research, gay marriage and abortions, championing public money for religious schools and social program, and appointing evangelized judges. Three days after 11 September, 2001, President Bush gave a dramatic address sounding like a sermon in the National Cathedral. Supported by prominent Jewish, Moslem and Christian figures, it seemed a model of multiculturalism. Religious moderates of every hue provide cover for fundamentalists by refusing to contest the extremists’ premises. How can they? They share them.

Yet no one stood for the tens of millions of nonreligious Americans. They were ignored as if they did not exist. Everyone in America believes in God. In the face of it all, atheists, agnostics and secular humanists have been timid and voiceless, ignored and derided, but described as devils. Now atheistic books have become bestsellers. Are Americans getting fed up with Republican religiosity as well as politics?

We commonly hear that only a tiny percentage of Americans don’t believe in God and that, as a Newsweek poll recently said, 91 percent do. It is not true. According to Ronald Aronson, a teacher at Wayne State University and author of Living Without God, published by Counterpoint, writing in The Nation, the American Religious Identification Survey, which interviewed 50,000 people, found 29 million adults to be without religion—one American in seven, 14 percent.

But a Financial Times/Harris poll of Europeans and Americans that allowed respondents to declare agnosticism as well as atheism found 18 percent of 2,000 Americans chose one or the other, with 73 percent believing in God or a supreme being. The poll also allowed for people to respond “Would prefer not to say” and six percent of Americans chose this to answer the question whether they believed in God or a supreme being, because they were scared to deny God publicly for fear of their religious friends and neighbours. So, the sum of unbelievers (18 percent + 6 percent) is not far off one in four Americans!

This large segment of Americans is fed up with being marginalized and insulted. They are mainly well educated people. A Harris American poll found 31 percent with postgraduate education do not believe in God, compared with 14 percent with a high school education or less. The better the education, the higher the percentage of disbelievers, reaching 93 percent among members of the National Academy of Sciences.

Unbelievers are to be found concentrated among those whose professional lives emphasize science or rationality and who also have developed a relatively high level of confidence in their own intellectual faculties. And they are frequently teachers or opinion-makers.
Ronald Aronson,The Nation